THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 56
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DOUGLAS H. LARROW and LAWRENCE E. THIEBEN
____________
Appeal No. 95-3715
Application No. 08/042,8991
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed April 5, 1993. According
to appellants, this application is continuation of Application
07/799,928, filed November 26, 1991, now abandoned; which is a
continuation of Application 07/474,260, filed February 5,
1990, now abandoned; which is a continuation of Application
07/168,453, filed March 15, 1988, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007