Appeal No. 95-4047
Application 07/931,206
exact terms as to enable a person of ordinary skill in the art
to make and use the invention, and/or that the claims fail to
particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter
which appellants regard as the invention.
OPINION
We have carefully considered all of the arguments
advanced by appellants and the examiner and agree with
appellants that the aforementioned rejection under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 is not well founded. Accordingly, we do not sustain
this rejection. Nor do we sustain the rejection under 35
U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph. We sustain the rejection under
35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, only as to claims 4 and 5.
Rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103
Vargas discloses a temporary window comprised of at least
two layers of transparent polymeric film held together by a
thin layer of transparent adhesive (col. 1, lines 44-48). At
least one of the outer layers is perforated or precut such
that strips or sections of that layer can be peeled off,
thereby exposing adhesive which is used to bond the temporary
window to a window frame such as that of an automobile (col.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007