Ex parte HOSHOWSKI - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1995-4072                                                        
          Application No. 08/105,008                                                  


                         (A) a water insoluble hair dye                               
                    encapsulated in                                                   
                         (B) a shell material;                                        
                    (ii)      a suspending agent to suspend the                       
               capsules; and                                                          
                    (iii) a carrier comprising water;                                 
               (b) breaking the capsules while the capsules are                       
          in contact with the hair to release the water insoluble hair                
          dye;                                                                        
               (c) while simultaneously disintegrating the shell                      
          material into residual particles having a diameter of about 10              
          microns or less; and                                                        
               (d) allowing the hair conditioning composition and the                 
          residual particles of shell material to remain in contact with              
          the hair at least until the next hair shampooing.                           
               As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies on the                 
          following prior art:                                                        
          Vanlerberghe et al. (Vanlerberghe)      5,021,200      Jan.  4,             
          1991                                                                        
          Noda et al. (Noda)                 5,089,269      Feb. 18, 1992             
                                                  (filed May 27, 1988)                
               Claims 1, 2, 4 through 22, 24 through 32 and 34 through                
          38 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over                
          the disclosure of Noda.  Claims 29 through 32 and 34 through                
          38 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over                
          the combined disclosures of Noda and Vanlerberghe.                          

                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007