THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GARY K. MICHELSON
____________
Appeal No. 1995-4105
Application No. 08/108,9081
____________
Before CALVERT, ABRAMS, and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
This case comes before us again on request for rehearing
by Examiner Thaler of our decision mailed December 30, 1998,
1Application for patent filed August 18, 1993. According
to appellant, this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application No. 07/905,127, filed June 24, 1992, now
abandoned; which is a continuation of Application No.
07/398,987, filed August 28, 1989, now abandoned; which is a
continuation-in-part of Application No. 07/341,849 filed April
24, 1989, now U.S. Patent No. 5,009,661 issued April 23, 1991.
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007