Appeal No. 95-4206
Application No. 07/803,465
CONCLUSION
We have not sustained the rejection of claims 1 through
4, 11 through 19, 29 through 36 and 40 through 48 under 35
U.S.C. 112, first or second paragraphs nor have we sustained
the rejection of claims 5 through 7 and 10 under 35 U.S.C.
102(e). We also have not sustained the rejections of claims 1
through 24, 26 through 37 and 39 through 47 under 35 U.S.C.
103 based on either Sarraf or Sarraf and Varaiya. We have,
however, sustained the rejection of claims 1 through 4, 11
through 19, 29 through 37 and 39 through 47 under 35 U.S.C.
103 based on either Sarraf in view of Dodson or Sarraf and
Varaiya in view of Dodson. We have not, however, sustained
the rejection of claims 5 through 10, 20 through 24 and 26
through 28 under 35 U.S.C. 103 even where Dodson was employed
against the claims.
Accordingly, the examiner’s decision is affirmed-in-part.
15
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007