THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being enteredtoday (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 62
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte YASUHIRO SHIMOJIMA, GENJI MORI, TAKASHI YOSHIOKA,
TOSHIO OZAKI, HIROYUKI HAMATO and ITSUO MAKINO
________________
Appeal No. 95-4386
Application 08/127,1391
________________
HEARD: June 7, 1999
________________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT and FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 4 to 9 and
1Application for patent filed September 27, 1993. According to appellants, the application is a continuation
of Application 07/875,596, filed April 28, 1992, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Application 07/167,318,
filed March 11, 1988, now abandoned. Appellants rely upon a Foreign priority filing date under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of
June 1, 1987.
-1-1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007