THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RALPH H. BLAND, JAMES M. JONZA, JAMES D. SMITH,
JEFFREY F. BRADLEY and KENNETH B. SMITH
____________
Appeal No. 95-4535
Application No. 07/955,1161
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and GARRIS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 1-14, 16-19, 22, 24-30, and 32-62.
In the examiner’s supplemental answer entered June 25, 1997 as
Paper
1Application for patent filed October 1, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007