Paper No. 47
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte WILLIAM R. MAJARIAN,
BRUCE A. D. STOCKER
and
SALETE M.C. NEWTON
______________
Appeal No. 95-4700
Application 07/837,6681
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH and LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1 through
11, 21, 31, 34, 37 through 41, 56 through 61, 72, 73, and 75. As clarified in the
Supplemental Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 43, July 10, 1996), claims 25 and 35 are
1Application for patent filed February 14, 1992. According to appellants, this application is a continuation
of Application 07/348,430, filed May 5, 1989; which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/190,570, filed
May 5, 1988, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007