THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DENNIS CHILSON
____________
Appeal No. 95-4733
Application No. 08/091,0301
____________
HEARD: April 5, 1999
____________
Before OWENS, WALTZ, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1 and 8 as amended
subsequent to the final rejection, along with finally rejected
dependent claims 2-7 and 9-15. Applicant submitted an
amendment dated Aug. 4, 1994 (Paper No. 6), after the final
1Application for patent filed July 14, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007