THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MILIVOJ K. BRUN, KRISHAN L. LUTHRA and RAJ N. SINGH
____________
Appeal No. 1995-4981
Application No. 08/248,5831
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WINTERS, METZ and PAK, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
claims 10 through 16, which are all of the claims pending in
1Application for patent filed May 24, 1994. According to
the appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 08/057,919, filed May 7, 1993, now abandoned,
which is a continuation of Application No. 07/716,444, filed
June 17, 1991, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007