Ex parte LASSON et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1995-5015                                                         
          Application 08/036,272                                                       






                                       OPINION                                         
               We have carefully considered all of the arguments                       
          advanced by appellants and the examiner and agree with                       
          appellants that the aforementioned rejection is not well                     
          founded.  Accordingly, we reverse this rejection.                            
               Holmström discloses a method for producing a packaging                  
          material wherein a laminate is formed by fastening a metal                   
          foil web to a paper or cardboard web by use of a thermoplastic               
          adhesive, the laminate is passed between pressure/cooling                    
          rollers, a layer of plastic is extruded onto the metal foil                  
          web, and the resulting laminate is passed between another set                
          of pressure/cooler rollers (col. 4, lines 20-32 and 54-56;                   
          figure 1).  Holmström does not apply a plastic film to a first               
          surface of a metal foil web to form a laminate, and attach a                 
          second surface of the metal foil web of the laminate to a core               
          layer by use of a binder material as required by appellants’                 
          claims.                                                                      
               Löfgren discloses a method for forming a laminate which                 


                                           3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007