THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte DAN F. SUCIU, PENNY M. WIKOFF
JOHN M. BELLER and CHARLES J. CARPENTER
_____________
Appeal No. 95-5092
Application 08/032,5811
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, WARREN and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-9, all the claims in the present
application. Claim 1 is illustrative:
1 Application filed March 17, 1993, for reissue of U.S. Patent No. 5,000,859 , issued March 19,
1991, based on application 07/263,161, filed Oct. 26 , 1988 .
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007