THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ULRICH SPECK
__________
Appeal No. 95-5133
Application 08/135,5231
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH and ROBINSON, , Administrative Patent Judges.
ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of
1Application for patent filed October 12, 1993. According to appellant, the application is a
continuation of Application 07/365,935, filed June 15, 1989, now U.S. Patent No. 5,288,716 issued
February 22, 1994; which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/156,990, filed February 18,
1988.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007