THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CHEL W. LEW
____________
Appeal No. 1996-0249
Application No. 08/076,7091
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before PAK, WARREN, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal
to allow claims 1-13 and 20-23. Claims 14-19 and 24-26, which
are all of the remaining pending claims in this application,
1Application for patent filed June 15, 1993. According
to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/534,496, filed June 7, 1990, now abandoned;
which is a continuation-in-part of Application No. 07/201,637,
filed June 2, 1988, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007