THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 45
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte AKIRA AOYAMA
____________
Appeal No. 1996-0442
Application No. 07/855,4421
____________
HEARD: September 16, 1999
____________
Before METZ, JOHN D. SMITH and LIEBERMAN, Administrative
Patent Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
1 Application for patent filed March 19, 1992. According to
appellant, this application is a continuation of Application No. 07/619,815
filed November 29, 1990, now abandoned; which is a continuation of Application
No. 07/327,438 filed March 23, 1989, now abandoned; which is a continuation of
Application No. 07/052,932 filed May 22, 1987, now abandoned; which is a
continuation-in-part of Application No. 06/819,659 filed January 17, 1986; now
U.S. Patent No. 4,801,499 issued January 31, 1989.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007