THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JENG-NAN SHIAU
____________
Appeal No. 96-0650
Application No. 08/117,5911
____________
HEARD: May 4, 1999
____________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and HECKER, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 40. In an Amendment After Final (paper number 15),
claims 1 and 17 were amended.2
1Application for patent filed September 7, 1993.
2The amendment had the effect of overcoming the
indefiniteness rejection of claims 1 and 17 (paper number 16).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007