THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MARVIN L. JONES
____________
Appeal No. 96-0655
Application No. 08/052,5071
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before METZ, JOHN D. SMITH, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s second rejection of claims 9 through 16 (see the
Rejection dated Dec. 7, 1994, Paper No. 7). Claims 1 through
8 and 22, the only other claims remaining in this application,
1Application for patent filed April 26, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007