THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte TONY S. PARTOW
and WILLIAM K. PETTY
_______________
Appeal No. 96-0671
Application 08/192,0781
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before URYNOWICZ, KRASS, and MARTIN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claim 5. Claims 6 through 8 have been indicated by the examiner
as allowable and are not before us on appeal.
The invention is directed to a digitizing tablet and, more
particularly, to the cancellation of common-mode signals in such
a tablet.
1 Application for patent filed February 4, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007