THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte THOMAS A. CROWELL, J. JEFFRY HOWBERT and JOHN S. WARD
____________
Appeal No. 1996-0721
Application No. 08/036,6401
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GARRIS, HANLON and PAK, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 14 through 26 and 28, which are all of the
claims pending in the application.
1Application for patent filed March 24, 1993. According
to the appellants, the application is a division of
Application No. 07/554,218, filed July 17, 1990, now Patent
No. 5,216,026, issued on June 6, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007