THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LUKE D. BOND, CHARLES C. MILLS, PHILIP WHITING and
ANTHONY H. MEHTA
____________
Appeal No. 1996-0864
Application No. 08/181,6951
____________
HEARD: October 6, 1999
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, WALTZ and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 19, 21 through
23, 25 through 27, and the examiner’s refusal to allow claims
24 and 28 as amended subsequent to the final rejection (see
the amendment dated June 22, 1995, Paper No. 16, entered as
1Application for patent filed January 14, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007