Ex parte KLINE et al. - Page 3




                     Appeal No. 1996-0910                                                                                                                                              
                     Application 08/118,368                                                                                                                                            


                     application for                                                                                                                                                   
                     patent in the United States.   As explained by the examiner,6                                                                                                     
                                           Boeing purchase order B 258096 discloses a sale                                                                                             
                                of a single-station hand-assisted lamination cell on                                                                                                   
                                June 10, 1992 and July 10, 1992, both of which                                                                                                         
                                occurred more than one year prior to Applicant’s                                                                                                       
                                [sic] U.S. filing date.  The HAL Cell is described                                                                                                     
                                in a Boeing news bulletin dated August 11, 1992 as                                                                                                     
                                using a laser to project the correct position of                                                                                                       
                                plies on a mandrel, as is now claimed [examiner’s                                                                                                      
                                answer, Paper No. 19, page 3].                                                                                                                         
                                                                                DISCUSSION                                                                                             
                                A claimed invention is considered to be on sale within                                                                                                 
                     the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) when two conditions are met                                                                                                     
                     before the critical date (i.e., more than one year prior to                                                                                                       
                     the filing date to which the claim is entitled).  First, the                                                                                                      
                     product must be the subject of a commercial offer for sale.                                                                                                       
                     Second, the invention must be ready for patenting.  The second                                                                                                    
                     condition may be satisfied in at least two ways: by proof of                                                                                                      
                     reduction to practice before the critical date or by proof                                                                                                        


                                6The final rejection (Paper No. 11) also included a 35                                                                                                 
                     U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claims 15 through 38 as being                                                                                                           
                     unpatentable over Mittelstadt et al. (U.S. Patent No.                                                                                                             
                     4,475,976) in view of Sarh et al. (U.S. Patent No. 4,512,837)                                                                                                     
                     and Heine (U.S. Patent No. 4,284,462).  Upon reconsideration,                                                                                                     
                     the examiner has withdrawn this rejection (see the advisory                                                                                                       
                     action dated June 21, 1995, Paper No. 15).                                                                                                                        
                                                                                          3                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007