Ex parte MILLER et al. - Page 1




                                THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                               
                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)                                                             
                was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                                                                
                not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                        
                                                                                                  Paper No. 31                             

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                              
                                                             __________                                                                    

                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                
                                                       AND INTERFERENCES                                                                   
                                                             __________                                                                    

                                   Ex parte GALE W. MILLER and CHARLES W. GAY                                                              
                                                             __________                                                                    
                                                      Appeal No. 96-0918                                                                   
                                                   Application 08/059,0171                                                                 
                                                            ___________                                                                    
                                                              ON BRIEF                                                                     
                                                            ___________                                                                    

                Before CALVERT, STAAB and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                              
                STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                        

                                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                   
                        This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of                                                           

                        1Application for patent filed May 5, 1993.  According to                                                           
                the appellant, the application is a continuation of                                                                        
                Application 07/760,358, filed September 16, 1991, now                                                                      
                abandoned.                                                                                                                 
                                                                    1                                                                      





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007