THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 72
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HELMUT KIPPHAN, GERHARD LOFFLER,
GUIDO KELLER, and HANS OTT
__________
Appeal No.96-0992
Application 08/293,9361
___________
HEARD: December 10, 1998
___________
Before CALVERT, STAAB, and STAAB, Administrative Patent
Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection
of claims 27 through 52. Claims 21 through 26, the only other
1Application for patent filed August 22, 1994. According
to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/915,751, filed July 21,1992; which is a
continuation of Application 06/939,966, filed December 10,
1986.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007