THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 74
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte SEPPO RUOTTU
________________
Appeal No. 96-1003
Application No. 08/115,7911
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before WINTERS, KIMLIN and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed September 3, 1993.
According to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/844,915, filed March 5, 1992; which is a
continuation of Application No. 07/536,931, filed June 12,
1990; which is a continuation of Application No. 06/640,526,
filed August 14, 1984; which is a continuation of Application
No. 06/371,796, filed April 26, 1982; all which have been
abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007