Ex parte WALTERS - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 1996-1045                                                                                                               
                 Application No. 08/143,415                                                                                                         




                                  3.  A pigmented, stereoregular, branched-mono-1-olefin polymer composition                                        
                          comprising:                                                                                                               
                                  (a)      tris(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxybenzyl)isocyanurate;                                                     
                                  (b)      bis(2,4-di-tert-butylphenyl)pentaerythritol diphosphite;                                                 
                                  (c)      a costabilizer selected from the group consisting of sodium stearoyl                                     
                          lactylate, calcium stearoyl lactylate, calcium lactate, and mixtures thereof;                                             
                                  (d)      2-Naphthalenecarboxyamide, N,N’-(2-chloro-1,4 phenylene)bis[4-                                           
                          [2,5-dichlorophenyl)azo]-3-hydroxy-;                                                                                      
                                  (e)      a stereoregular, branched-mono-1-olefin polymer.                                                         

                          The examiner relies on the following reference in rejecting the appealed claims:                                          

                          Yukawa                            4,366,280                  Dec. 28, 1982                                                

                          Claims 3 through 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                                       

                 Yukawa.  We reverse this rejection.                                                                                                

                          In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given careful consideration to the appellant’s                           

                 specification and claims, to the applied prior art reference and to the respective positions articulated by                        

                 the appellant and the examiner.  We make reference to the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 10, mailed                                  

                 August 17, 1995) for the examiner’s reasoning in support of the rejection, and to the appellant’s                                  

                 amended brief (Paper No. 11, filed September 5, 1995) for the appellant’s arguments thereagainst.                                  

                          Appellant’s invention is directed to a pigmented, stereoregular, branched-mono-1-olefin                                   

                 polymer composition comprising (e) a stereoregular, branched-mono-1-olefin polymer, a specific                                     

                 pigment, i.e., (d) 2-Naphthalenecarboxyamide, N,N’-(2-chloro-1,4 phenylene)bis[4-[2,5-                                             


                                                                         2                                                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007