THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte GUSTAAF A. WESSELINK and FRANCISCUS A. S. LIGTHART
________________
Appeal No. 96-1083
Application 08/150,0991
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims
1 through 3, 5 and 9 through 14. Claims 4 and 6 through 8
have been canceled.
The disclosed invention is concerned with a low-
1Application for patent filed November 19, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007