THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte ROBERT J. CAVA and JAMES J. KRAJEWSKI
________________
Appeal No. 96-1231
Application 08/165,1431
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
claims 1 and 3-6, which are all of the claims remaining in the
1Application for patent filed December 10, 1993.
According to appellants, the application is a continuation-in-
part of Application 08/143,419, filed October 26, 1993, now U.
S. Patent No. 5,413,755, issued May 9, 1995.
-1-1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007