Appeal No. 1996-1240
Application 08/044,961
1962).
For the above reasons, we find that the examiner has not
set forth a factual basis which is sufficient to support a
holding of prima facie obviousness of the method recited in
either of appellant’s claims 2 or 5. We therefore reverse the
examiner’s rejection.
DECISION
The rejection of claims 2 and 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103
over Pinckard is reversed.
REVERSED
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007