Ex parte ZIEGLER et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                       
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)               
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                  
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                          
                                                             Paper No. 19              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                    _____________                                      
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _____________                                      
              Ex parte MICHAEL L. ZIEGLER, ROBERT J. BROOKS, WILLIAM R.                
            BRYG,         CRAIG R. FRINK, THOMAS R. HOTCHKISS, ROBERT D.               
                    ODINEAL,  JAMES B. WILLIAMS and JOHN L. WOOD                       
                                    _____________                                      
                                 Appeal No. 1996-1259                                  
                               Application 08/201,1851                                 
                                    ______________                                     
                                                                                      
          ON BRIEF                                                                     
                                                                                      
          ____________                                                                 

          Before BARRETT, FLEMING, and FRAHM, Administrative Patent                    
          Judges.                                                                      
          FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s               
          final rejection of claims 1 to 4, which constitute all of the                


               1Application for patent filed February 24, 1994.                        
                                           1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007