THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 37
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte PATRICK J. FRANZ, PHILIP D. BIEHL
DAVID H. STRAAYER and ROBERT H. DODIER
________________
Appeal No. 1996-1385
Application 08/006,1391
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before JERRY SMITH, BARRETT and RUGGIERO, Administrative
Patent Judges.
1 Application for patent filed January 19,1993. According to appellants
this application is a continuation of 07/688,921, filed April 19, 1991 now
abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of 07/649,711 filed February 01,
1991, now United States Patent 5,189,403, issued February 23, 1993, which
application is a continuation-in-part of 07/412,680, filed September 26, 1989,
now United States Patent 5,124,689, issued June 23, 1992 and a continuation-
in-part of 07/557,546, filed July 24, 1990; and a continuation-in-part of
application 07/672,641, filed March 18, 1991.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007