Ex parte DEPATIE et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-1425                                                          
          Application No. 08/133,492                                                  

               1.  A device for controlling a stepper motor that drives               
          one or more camera elements, in which the rotation and                      
          position of the rotor of the stepper motor is monitored to                  
          determine when the next step of the stepper motor should be                 
          stepped, said device characterized by:                                      

               a rotor positional indicator having equally spaced first               
          and second areas that are a whole number multiple of the                    
          number of steps for one full revolution of the rotor of the                 
          stepper motor;                                                              
               means coupled to said indicator for detecting the                      
          transitions between said first and second areas; and                        
               means coupled to said detecting means for rotating the                 
          rotor of the stepper motor relative to the position of the                  
          rotor of the stepper motor so that the stepper motor has the                
          proper number of steps to cause the camera element to move to               
          the correct position.                                                       

               The Examiner’s Answer cites the following prior art:                   
          Erlichman                     4,196,987                Apr.  8,             
          1980                                                                        
          Sakai et al. (Sakai)     4,812,727                Mar. 14, 1989             
          Ishimaru                 5,057,859                Oct. 15, 1991             

                                       OPINION                                        
               Claims 1-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                    
          unpatentable over Ishimaru and Sakai.  Claims 14-17 stand                   
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Ishimaru                
          and Sakai as applied to claims 1-13, further in view of                     
          Erlichman.                                                                  

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007