Ex parte YAMAZAKI et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-1515                                                          
          Application 08/161/859                                                      



               5.  An electronic device comprising a semiconductor chip               
          and a package made of a resin enclosing said semiconductor                  
          chip, wherein said device is characterized in that a                        
          protective film is formed on the outermost surface of said                  
          electronic device, said protective film being in contact with               
          outside air.                                                                
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Omori et al. (Omori)          4,972,250           Nov. 20,                  
          1990                                                                        
          (filed Mar. 02,                                                             
          1987)                                                                       
          Iga (Japanese Kokai)          62-155542           July 10,                  
          1987                                                                        
          Kihira (Japanese Kokai)       63-15448            Jan. 22,                  
          1988                                                                        
          Claims 1, 5, 15 and 28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                       
          § 112, first paragraph, as being based on an inadequate                     
          disclosure.  Claims 1-4, 7, 15-28 and 30-32 stand rejected                  
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the teachings              
          of Iga.  Claims 5, 6 and 14  stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §               
          102(b) as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35                   
          U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Iga.  Claims 8-13 stand rejected               
          under 35 U.S.C.      § 103 as being unpatentable over the                   
          teachings of Iga in view of Kihira and Omori.                               
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the                       

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007