THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No.22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HENRY F. GRAY
__________
Appeal No. 1996-1552
Application 08/241,9761
___________
HEARD: October 5, 1999
___________
Before THOMAS, FLEMING and FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellant has appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 25 to 29.
Claims 1 to 24 have been canceled. Thus, only claims 25 to 29 remain on appeal, with method claim2
1Application for patent filed May 12, 1994. According to appellant, the application is a division of
Application 07/921,658 filed July 30, 1992, which is now U.S. Patent No. 5,359,256.
2Claims 1 to 24 were canceled as per appellant’s amendment of May 12, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007