THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte STEPHEN T. CHAMBERS and RICHARD G. TAYLOR
_____________
Appeal No. 96-1583
Application 08/066,6181
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH, and SPIEGEL, Administrative
Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1,
2, 4, 5, and 8. Claims 10-14 stand withdrawn from
consideration, and claims 3, 6, 7 and 9, the other claims
Application for patent filed May 24, 1993. According to appellants,1
this application is a continuation of application 07/881,309, filed May 7,
1992, which is a continuation of application 07/690,103, filed April 23, 1991,
both now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007