THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PHILEMON L. BRUNER and DAVID C. BUGGE
____________
Appeal No. 96-1605
Application No. 07/887,6291
____________
HEARD: March 10, 1999
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, STAAB
and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed May 22, 1992. According
to appellants, this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application No. 07/754,202 filed August 21, 1991, now
abandoned; which is a continuation of Application No.
07/469,306 filed January 24, 1990, now abandoned; which is a
continuation-in-part of Application No. 07/163,307 filed March
16, 1988, now U.S. Patent No. 4,911,280 issued March 27, 1990;
which is a continuation-in-part of Application No. 07/042,797
filed April 27, 1987, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007