THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DONALD L. PLUMTON
____________
Appeal No. 1996-1616
Application No. 08/158,6731
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before BARRETT, TORCZON, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 9. Claims 10 through 16 have
been withdrawn from consideration.
The appellant's invention relates to an integrated
circuit having the same layer of semiconductor material
Application for patent filed November 29, 1993. According to1
appellant, this application is a continuation-in-part of Application No.
08/056,682, filed April 30, 1993, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007