THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte NICHOLAS A. W. VILIESID
____________
Appeal No. 96-1628
Application No. 08/167,6171
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 11, 12, 21, 22, 24, and 31 through 36.
Claims 2 through 10, 13 through 17, and 37 have been withdrawn
from consideration as being directed to nonelected claims.
Application for patent filed December 15, 1993. According to1
appellant, this application is a continuation of application 07/842,644, filed
February 27, 1992. Now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007