Ex parte VALSECCHI et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1996-1864                                                        
          Application No. 08/330,349                                                  


               Claim 1 is representative of the subject matter on appeal              
          and reads as follows:                                                       
          1.   A silver halide radiographic element comprising a                      
          polymeric film base, at least one gelatin silver halide                     
          emulsion layer, and at least one antistatic layer adhered to                
          at least one side of said polymeric film base, wherein (1)                  
          said silver halide emulsion layer comprises tabular silver                  
          halide grains having an average diameter to thickness ratio of              
          at least 3:1, and (2) said antistatic layer comprises a                     
          colloidal vanadium oxide and a sulfopolyester and an adhesion-              
          promoting amount of an epoxy-silane compound.                               
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner are:                                                               
          Guestaux                      4,203,769                May  20,             
          1980                                                                        
          Valsecchi                          4,582,782                Apr.            
          15, 1986                                                                    
          Anderson et al. (Anderson)    5,006,451                Apr.  9,             
          1991                                                                        
          Buchanan et al. (Buchanan)    5,203,884                Apr. 20,             
          1993                                                                        
          Chang et al. (Chang)          5,372,985                Dec. 13,             
          1994                                                                        
                                                  (Filed Feb. 9,                      
          1993)                                                                       
               Claims 1 through 18, 21 through 27 and 29 through 35                   
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the               
          combined disclosures of Anderson, Chang, Guestaux, Buchanan                 
          and Valsecchi.                                                              
               We reverse.                                                            

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007