Ex parte RIVERA et al. - Page 7




          Appeal No. 96-1869                                                          
          Application 08/086,494                                                      


          Miles disclosures as regards the lack of a teaching of or                   
          suggestion for the claimed feature of a slot element having a               
          cavity comprising a housing for a glide slope antenna and a                 
          volume of an aircraft landing gear door.  Thus, the rejection               
          of independent claims 3 and 11, and claims dependent                        
          therefrom, must be reversed.                                                


               The rejection of claims 1 and 2 is also reversed.                      
          Independent claim 1 requires, inter alia, a glide slope                     
          antenna disposed “on” the leading edge of a nose gear door,                 
          and an electromagnetic window for coupling radio frequency                  
          energy “into” the nose gear door.  Simply stated, the                       
          collective teachings of Stapleton, Noble, Miles, and Young,                 
          would not have suggested a glide slope antenna disposed “on”                
          the leading edge of a nose gear door, and an electromagnetic                
          window for coupling radio frequency energy “into” the nose                  
          gear door, as claimed.                                                      


               The rejection of independent claims 9, 10, and 16 is                   
          reversed for the procedural reason that follows.                            


                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007