THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte GERALD CROUSE
_____________
Appeal No. 96-1901
Application 07/925,7901
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before COHEN, ABRAMS and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting claims 2-4 and 7-10. As for
the remaining claims of record, claim 1 has been canceled and appeal has not been taken from the final
rejection of claims 5 and 6. No claims have been allowed.
1Application for patent filed August 7, 1992. According to appellant, this application is a
continuation-in-part of Application 07/601,497, filed October 23, 1990, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007