THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 49
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte FRANK SEELA, HEINZ-PETER MUTH, KLAUS KAISER
WERNER BOURGEOIS, KLAUS MUHLEGGER
HERBERT VON DER ELITZ and HANS-GEORG BATZ
_____________
Appeal No. 96-1964
Application No. 07/908,513
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH and ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judges.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision rejecting claims 49 and 50.
Claims 26 through 29 and 48, which are the only other claims remaining in the applica-tion,
stand withdrawn from further consideration by the examiner as directed to a non-elected
invention.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007