THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PETER C. KNUPPEL, REINHARD LANTZSCH,
KLAUS JELICH, PETER ANDRES and ALBRECHT MARHOLD
____________
Appeal No. 1996-2042
Application No. 08/086,6021
____________
HEARD: November 16, 1999
____________
Before GARRIS, JOHN D. SMITH, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative
Patent Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed 08/086,602. According to
appellants, the application is a division of Application No.
07/843,480, filed February 28, 1992, now U.S. Patent No.
5,258,526, issued November 2, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007