THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte PETER J. FERNHOLZ, SANDRA WITT,
HANS-PETER KOEHLER, WOLFGANG PREIBSCH,
HORST PRUEHS and KARL-HEINZ ROGMANN
_____________
Appeal No. 96-2059
Application 08/182,8691
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, KIMLIN, and JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative
Patent Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1-21. Subsequent to final rejection, claim 4
1 Application for patent filed January 14, 1994. According
to applicants, the application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 08/057,728, filed May 5, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007