THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TIMOTHY F. BRYANT, SIMON B. DODD, STEPHEN M.
FLITCROFT, WILLIAM S. MILLER, ROGER MORETON and CHRISTOPHER J.
PEEL
____________
Appeal No. 96-2060
Application No. 08/308,2051
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CAROFF, ELLIS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed September 19, 1994.
According to the appellants, the application is a continuation
of Application No. 07/888,287, filed May 26, 1992, now
abandoned; which is a continuation of Application No.
07/698,391, filed
May 10, 1991, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007