THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DALE SCHULZE
__________
Appeal No. 96-2192
Application 08/306,8561
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before THOMAS, BARRETT, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent
Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellant has appealed to the Board from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 2 through 4, 30 and 31, which
constitute all the claims remaining in the application.
Application for patent filed September 15, 1994.1
According to appellant, the application is a continuation of
Application 08/092,734, filed July 14, 1993, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007