Ex parte KAMIYAMA et al. - Page 2




              Appeal No. 96-2446                                                                                        
              Application 08/246,179                                                                                    


                                                   BACKGROUND                                                           

                     The invention is directed to a data processing apparatus within a data processing                  
              system which allows data of various widths to be processed.  The system includes an                       
              instruction decoder to decode the instruction, then the instruction is processed by the                   
              calculator/ALU.  The system uses the conditional branch designation as a selector signal                  
              to select between the stored flag groups for the different size data.  The system further                 
              uses the selected stored flag group to determine whether to perform a branch operation.                   
                     Appellants have indicated the grouping of the claims as Group I: claims 1-9; Group                 
              II: claims 10-11; and Group III: claim 12.   Appellants have not clearly set                              
              forth separate arguments for patentability for each group as required by 37 CFR                           
              §§ 1.192(c)(7) and 1.192(c)(8)(iv).  Appellants have only identified general benefits and                 
              have provided only explicit arguments to claim limitations which are expressly found in                   
              Claim 12 with respect to "simultaneously storing."  All other arguments appear to be                      
              directed generally towards limitations found in independent claims 1, 10 and 12.                          
              Therefore, claims 1-11 will be considered as one group with representative claim 1.  The                  
              second group will consist solely of claim 12.                                                             
                     Independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                                                      


                     1.  An apparatus for processing data comprising:                                                   


                                                           2                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007