Appeal No. 96-2520
Application 07/891,852
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS and FLEMING, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejec-
tion of claims 1 through 5 and 7 through 12. Claim 6 has been
canceled. Appellant has filed an after final amendment amend-
ing claim 1 and canceling claim 3 which has been entered,2
thereby these amended claims are properly before us for our
consideration.
Appellant's invention relates to a high power dia-
phragm electro-acoustical transducer for transforming electri-
cal signals into acoustical signals. On page 10 of the speci-
fication, Appellant discloses that the invention is character-
ized such that each portion of the diaphragm of the transducer
is made of a very good heat conductive material, preferably an
2In a letter dated January 17, 1996, the Examiner stated
the applicant's amendment filed November 21, 1995 has been
entered. We note that Appellant filed another after final
amendment on December 26, 1995 which appears to be a duplicate
of the November 21, 1995 amendment.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007