THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte TAKEHARU ARAKAWA,
MORIO ARAKI and
KIYOSHI YAMANAKA
_____________
Appeal No. 96-2583
Application 08/243,0871
______________
HEARD: JULY 13, 1999
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT and FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 7 through 11, 13 and 14. In an Amendment
1Application for patent filed May 16, 1994. According to appellants, this application is a
continuation of Application 07/868,697, filed April 15, 1992, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007