THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte NEIL H. NODELMAN, ALBERT MAGNOTTA
and ROBERT LORING
__________
Appeal No. 96-2708
Application 08/335,4321
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before WINTERS, DOWNEY and GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judges.
DOWNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 3-6.
Claim 7 remains in the application and stands objected to by the examiner (Answer, page
3).
1Application for patent filed November 7, 1994. According to the appellants, the
application is a continuation of Application 08/207,504, filed March 8, 1994; which is a
continuation-in-part of Application 08/052,009, filed April 22, 1993, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007