THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte FREDERICK A. NABITY, PAUL G. WRIGHT,
RAYMOND HULINSKY and DOUGLAS T. CARSON
____________
Appeal No. 1996-2795
Application No. 08/430,1551
____________
HEARD: November 2, 1999
____________
Before HAIRSTON, RUGGIERO, and HECKER, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed April 26, 1995. According
to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 08/120,724, filed September 13, 1993, now
abandoned; which is a division of Application No. 07/807,200,
filed December 16, 1991, now U.S. Patent No. 5,401,139, issued
March 28, 1995; which is a division of Application No.
07/474,154, filed February 2, 1990, now U.S. Patent No. 5,
125,801, issued June 30, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007